![]() ![]() The evidence for this hypothetical " Planet Nine" has been building over the past few years, as astronomers such as Mike Brown, Konstantin Batygin, Scott Sheppard and Chad Trujillo have noticed weird clustering in the orbits of small objects beyond Neptune. Rumors spread like wildfire on the internet, but the same technology can make it easier than ever to delve into the scientific evidence about such events.Īll of the above notwithstanding, there may actually be a big, undiscovered world lurking in the dark, cold depths of the outer solar system. People have been decrying the end of the world for hundreds of years. Nothing to fearĭoomsday reports across the internet frequently incite fear, but it's interesting to note they are nothing new. ![]() On top of that, most of the thousands of professional astronomers are linked not to the government but rather to private universities.Īstronomer David Morrison pointed out in 2012 that "NASA and the government get most of their information from these outside astronomers, not the other way around."īetween the amateur and professional astronomers, there are plenty of people who would have noticed a new "star" in the sky. The most common rebuttal to this is the cry of "Cover up!" However, there are hundreds of thousands of amateur astronomers around the world, many of whom own their own telescopes. ![]() This would have made it visible to astronomers everywhere. Easily performed calculations show that, by April 2012, it would have been brighter than the faintest stars viewed from a city, and almost as bright as Mars at its dimmest. The easiest and most verifiable piece of evidence arguing against the existence of the theoretical planet can be performed by anyone: According to the information available, a planet with a 3,600-year-long orbit that was due to impact Earth in 2012 should be available to the naked eye. After only a few trips, its gravity would have significantly disrupted the other planets, whose own gravitational pushes would have changed the hypothetical world's orbit significantly. Both papers are available to the public.Ī planet with an orbit so eccentric that it took 3,600 years to orbit the sun would create instabilities inside our 4.5-billion-year-old solar system. In the follow-up of the 1984 survey, most of the sources turned out to be distant galaxies. Such surveys are common in astronomy and usually involve follow-ups that individually detail the more interesting sources. A complete list can be found here.Īlternatively, Sky Q will be able to stream Blue Planet II in 4K too, just not with HLG technology.Proponents of the fictitious planet note that, in 1984, a scientific paper was published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters which discussed several infrared sources with "no counterparts" that turned up in a survey of the sky. To be able to watch the 4K HDR version of Blue Planet II, you will need a compatible TV and a decent broadband connection.Ĭompatible sets include 2015, 20 models from Panasonic, LG, Hisense, Philips, Samsung and Sony. The Beeb says streaming Blue Planet II in 4K HDR using HLG presents "the most natural colours possible on a television at home." How to watch Blue Planet II in 4K HDR on your TV Hybrid Log Gamma also makes it possible for those with non-HDR 4K TVs to still get an HDR-like picture, so long as it supports the BT.2020 colour gamut. It should, one day, also make it possible to broadcast live 4K HDR programmes. It's all been made possible thanks to Hybrid Log Gamma, the HDR format developed by the BBC and Japanese broadcaster NHK. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |